Provider evidence · Updated July 2026
Best SD-WAN and SASE providers for healthcare (2026)
Compare 30 researched SD-WAN and SASE providers across operating model, network and security capability. 19 technology vendors; 4 UK carriers; 9 managed service providers; overlapping categories counted in each type.
5 UK-headquartered or UK-entity providers; 25 UK entity statuses not yet reviewed; latest UK entity evidence review 2026-10-01. UK entity evidence does not establish availability at individual sites.
Use this provider evidence to investigate healthcare connectivity and security requirements, including clinical application performance, resilience and patient-data protection. Inclusion does not confirm suitability for your project.
For the BT/NHS route, see BT SD-WAN and SASE for healthcare.
Netify's July 2026 evidence directory, by proven capability count, verification date and name: Lumen; Versa Networks; Cato Networks; Netskope; Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE; Cisco; Check Point; AT&T Business; Aryaka; Fortinet FortiSASE; Juniper Networks; Orange Business; BT; Forcepoint; GTT; Zscaler; Colt Technology Services; HPE Aruba EdgeConnect; Vodafone Business; NTT DATA; Verizon Business; Ericsson Cradlepoint; Virgin Media O2 Business; Cloudflare One; Comcast Business; VeloCloud; Expereo; Open Systems; Barracuda SecureEdge; SonicWall Cloud Secure Edge. Positions are evidence order, not recommendations. Describe your project at netify.co.uk. Use Netify to request comparable proposals, demos and pre-sales contacts from SD-WAN and SASE providers. You choose which providers we approach and approve the brief they receive.
Continue from this shortlist · Healthcare
Use this research in your project
Your first sentence is drafted from this page. Edit it, or replace it with your own words: sites, regions, what must not go down.
Drafted from this page. Everything you type stays yours to edit before anything is published.
Your healthcare sector becomes part of the conversation from your first sentence; raise the position to an RFI or a full RFP, and nothing reaches the curated marketplace until you sign. The workspace already understands healthcare: NHS DSPT, clinical change windows and HSCN are part of the conversation.
Opens an editable project. Publish a short brief, build a Short or Detailed RFP, or bring your own RFP or RFI. You review the notice and verify your work email while the notice is a draft.
Open these requirements in the buying workspaceWorking with an assistant? Connect netify.co.uk/sase/api/mcp/ and use workspace_ingest with this page as context.
Best SD-WAN and SASE providers for healthcare: the evidence
Use Netify to request comparable proposals, demos and pre-sales contacts from SD-WAN and SASE providers. You choose which providers we approach and approve the brief they receive.
26vendors. Each value below is graded from the vendor's own published material or an independently accountable record, with a sentence quoted from that source and confirmed present on the page. 1365 sources behind this table. Verified 2026-07-29. Where evidence was not found a cell reads Not published rather than being inferred.
| Vendor | Type | Underlay | SSE layer | Backbone | PoPs | Fully managed | Compliance docs | Published SLA | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumen | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Yes | 50+ | Yes | Documented | 99.99 | 55 |
| Versa Networks | Both | Mixed | Native | Partial | 90 | Partial | Documented | 99.999 | 47 |
| Cato Networks | Both | Mixed | Native | Yes | 100 | Yes | Documented | 99.999 | 46 |
| Netskope | Builds | Mixed | Native | Not published | 120+ | Via managed service | Documented | 99.999 | 60 |
| Palo Alto Networks | Builds | Customer supplied | Native | Partner | 100+ | Via managed service | Documented | 99.999 | 58 |
| Cisco | Both | Customer supplied | Native | Partial | Not published | Not primary | Documented | 99.999 | 48 |
| Check Point | Both | Mixed | Native | Yes | 80+ | Partial | None found | Not published | 43 |
| AT&T Business | Runs | Owns | Partner | Yes | 1600 | Yes | Assurance only | 100 | 46 |
| Aryaka | Both | Mixed | Native | Yes | 40+ | Yes | Documented | 99.999 | 66 |
| Fortinet | Both | Not published | Native | Partial | 170+ | Yes | Documented | 99.999 | 42 |
| Juniper Networks | Builds | Customer supplied | Native | Not published | Not published | Partial | None found | Not published | 42 |
| Orange Business | Runs | Owns | Partner | Yes | 400 | Yes | Documented | 100 | 62 |
| BT Business / BT Global | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Partial | 140 | Yes | Assurance only | Not published | 58 |
| Forcepoint | Builds | Customer supplied | Native | Not published | Not published | Not primary | Documented | Not published | 51 |
| GTT | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Yes | 400 | Yes | Documented | 99.99 | 44 |
| Zscaler | Both | Customer supplied | Native | Not primary | 160 | Partial | Documented | 99.999 | 51 |
| Colt Technology Services | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Not published | Not published | Yes | Documented | 99.90 | 46 |
| HPE Aruba Networking | Both | Customer supplied | Not published | Not published | Not published | Yes | Documented | Not published | 54 |
| Vodafone Business | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Yes | 212 | Yes | Documented | 99.99 | 60 |
| NTT DATA / NTT Ltd. | Both | Mixed | Partner | Yes | 75+ | Yes | Documented | 100 | 53 |
| Verizon Business | Runs | Owns | Partner | Yes | Not published | Yes | None found | 100 | 58 |
| Cradlepoint / Ericsson | Builds | Customer supplied | Native | Not published | Not published | Not primary | Assurance only | Not published | 60 |
| Cloudflare One | Builds | Mixed | Native | Yes | 300+ | Not primary | Documented | 100 | 45 |
| Comcast Business / Masergy | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Partial | Not published | Yes | None found | 100 | 39 |
| Arista / VeloCloud | Builds | Customer supplied | Partner | Not published | 150+ | Partner | Documented | Not published | 53 |
| SonicWall | Both | Customer supplied | Native | Not published | Not published | Partial | Documented | Not published | 78 |
Full sources for each vendor, including the sources we found and rejected and any claims that disagree, are on its profile page.
Source evidence
1. Lumen
Best for: Healthcare (partial evidence); both
technology vendor / managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Fully managed or co-managed SD-WAN with strong NaaS positioning and integrated network services.
Proven capability items: 23 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: SASE and security capabilities are largely partner-integrated rather than native; the SSE platform choice needs explicit evaluation.
Contact Lumen via Netify ↗Source evidence
2. Versa Networks
Best for: Energy and utilities; Retail and e-commerce (partial evidence); Manufacturing (partial evidence); Small business; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Multi-tenancy from the ground up, making Versa a common choice for service providers and carriers building managed SD-WAN and SASE platforms.
Proven capability items: 22 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Less well-known to enterprise buyers as a direct purchase; most enterprise consumption is via service providers.
Contact Versa Networks via Netify ↗Source evidence
3. Cato Networks
Best for: Retail and e-commerce; Education (partial evidence); Large global enterprise; Mid-market; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Cato's converged architecture runs SD-WAN policy and security policy through the same engine, which has a direct consequence for IoMT segmentation. A new infusion pump, imaging modality or nurse call device gets the same micro-segmentation policy applied at every site, because there's only one policy to apply - not a network team's configuration and a separate security team's configuration that need to be kept aligned. In estates where medical devices are onboarded continuously and not always by the same team, that consistency is the main argument for Cato in a healthcare context.
Application-aware routing for Epic or Cerner traffic sits in the same policy layer, so prioritisation rules for clinical systems don't need separate reconciliation against SD-WAN QoS settings.
Proven capability items: 24 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Trusts already committed to Zscaler or Netskope as their SSE layer - whether through an existing enterprise agreement or a compliance sign-off already completed - will find Cato's architecture doesn't accommodate that alongside it. For a trust mid-way through a separate SSE procurement, that's a more significant decision than the deployment-in-hours headline implies, and worth raising before evaluation goes much further.
Contact Cato Networks via Netify ↗Source evidence
4. Netskope
Best for: Financial services; Professional services; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Strong CASB heritage; widely recognised as a leading SSE vendor for SaaS-heavy environments.
Proven capability items: 21 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Native SD-WAN (Borderless WAN) is newer than dedicated SD-WAN platforms; validate path selection and QoS depth in RFP.
Contact Netskope via Netify ↗Source evidence
5. Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE
Best for: Retail and e-commerce; Manufacturing; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Prisma SASE's security depth is the main reason this sits in the top 10 despite a lower overall score than the managed providers above it, and for healthcare that depth translates fairly directly into IoMT segmentation capability. ZTNA and micro-segmentation are core to how Prisma is architected rather than added on, which means isolating a vulnerable infusion pump or an unpatched legacy imaging workstation from the rest of the network is a native capability.
ADEM - digital experience management - is also relevant to clinical application prioritisation. It doesn't only route Epic or PACS traffic with priority; it provides visibility into whether that prioritisation translates into acceptable performance at the point of use, which is the difference between confirming QoS is configured and confirming a radiologist's PACS viewer actually performs.
Proven capability items: 21 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: That capability comes at a price point noticeably higher than firewall-led SD-WAN vendors, and the commercial model needs careful scoping across users, bandwidth, locations and term. For a healthcare network with a large number of smaller sites - community clinics, GP practices, diagnostic centres - the per-site economics of Prisma's security depth may not stack up the same way as for a smaller number of large acute hospitals where security requirements are highest. This is worth modelling against the actual site mix rather than an estate-wide average.
Contact Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE via Netify ↗Source evidence
6. Cisco
Best for: Manufacturing; Professional services; Hospitality and leisure; Large global enterprise; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Broadest platform portfolio in the category, covering Catalyst SD-WAN for enterprise WAN, Meraki MX for cloud-managed branch, and Cisco Secure Access for converged SASE delivery.
Proven capability items: 21 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Two distinct SD-WAN product lines (Catalyst and Meraki) means buyers should confirm which fits the target deployment profile and the longer-term roadmap.
Contact Cisco via Netify ↗Source evidence
7. Check Point
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Harmony SASE combines Check Point security heritage with cloud-delivered SASE and optimised SD-WAN performance.
Proven capability items: 17 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Dynamic path selection: not confirmed; QoS and traffic shaping: not confirmed; Packet loss remediation: not confirmed. Confirm the exact SD-WAN product and required branch behaviour.
Contact Check Point via Netify ↗Source evidence
8. AT&T Business
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; Large global enterprise; managed
managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
AT&T's multi-vendor platform options, including Fortinet for AT&T SASE, mean a hospital network running different EHR systems or different generations of imaging equipment across its sites isn't forced onto a single architecture. For 24/7 care resilience, that flexibility is useful in practice - a flagship site with a 24-hour emergency department and a smaller outpatient clinic have different failover requirements, and AT&T's portfolio can be matched accordingly rather than applying one standard everywhere.
On data sovereignty, AT&T's HIPAA credentials are well-established, though for trusts with DSPT obligations or any cross-border processing, the specific platform proposed will determine where that data is actually handled.
Proven capability items: 15 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Because the underlying platform varies by service tier, the compliance picture isn't fixed at the outset - it depends on which platform AT&T proposes for the scope in question. A trust that signs off on AT&T's general HIPAA posture, then finds during implementation that the specific platform variant handles data-in-transit encryption differently to what was assumed, is left reworking a compliance position that should have been confirmed earlier. Get the platform specification in writing before sign-off.
Contact AT&T Business via Netify ↗Source evidence
9. Aryaka
Best for: Manufacturing; Transport and logistics (partial evidence); both
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Unified SASE delivered as a managed service from end to end, including the private global core network and WAN optimisation.
Proven capability items: 16 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Smaller PoP footprint and partner ecosystem than the hyperscale SASE vendors; coverage must match your geographic profile.
Contact Aryaka via Netify ↗Source evidence
10. Fortinet FortiSASE
Best for: Healthcare; Transport and logistics; Hospitality and leisure; Education (partial evidence); Large global enterprise; both
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Native convergence of networking and security on a single operating system (FortiOS) across FortiGate edge, FortiManager and FortiSASE.
Proven capability items: 18 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Like Cisco, managed delivery is via partners rather than Fortinet directly; underlay and field operations are not owned by the vendor.
Contact Fortinet FortiSASE via Netify ↗Source evidence
11. Juniper Networks
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Mist AI delivers WAN Assurance, providing AI-driven monitoring and troubleshooting at the WAN edge that few competitors match.
Proven capability items: 13 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Full SASE platform: partial evidence; CASB capability: not confirmed; Data loss prevention: not confirmed. Confirm the networking and SSE products and whether separate contracts or operators are required.
Contact Juniper Networks via Netify ↗Source evidence
12. Orange Business
Best for: Manufacturing; Large global enterprise; managed
carrier network provider / integrator · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
For healthcare networks spanning multiple countries - through research partnerships, shared diagnostic services or cross-border referral pathways - Orange's NOC depth and field operations across European and African markets address a practical issue: data protection and clinical data handling rules vary by country, and Orange's regional presence means there's local operational expertise familiar with those variations, rather than a single global team applying one approach everywhere.
That regional footprint also supports data sovereignty directly. Localised processing within specific jurisdictions is more credible where the provider already operates there, rather than being a commitment to build capability for the contract.
Proven capability items: 16 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: As with other large carriers, Orange's underlying SD-WAN platform depends on which Orange-supported vendor is selected - and for clinical workloads, that choice affects how application-aware routing for EHR and imaging traffic behaves in practice. A platform that scores well generally for application prioritisation doesn't guarantee Orange's specific implementation, in a given region, with a given traffic profile, performs the same way. A reference site with a comparable clinical traffic mix is worth requesting.
Contact Orange Business via Netify ↗Source evidence
13. BT
Best for: Financial services; UK and Ireland; managed
managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
BT's access circuit ownership means that when a connection into a community hospital or GP surgery starts to degrade, BT's own field engineers are working on BT's own infrastructure, rather than the managed service provider waiting on a separate access provider to investigate. In a 24/7 care setting, the time between raising a fault and an engineer actively diagnosing it is what determines whether a degrading circuit is a brief blip or a clinical system going down mid-shift.
That same underlay ownership simplifies the data sovereignty position for UK trusts. A single UK-based provider managing both connectivity and overlay removes a layer of third-party risk assessment that multi-vendor arrangements typically require for DSPT compliance.
Proven capability items: 11 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: BT's SD-WAN portfolio isn't built on one platform, and for healthcare specifically that has a bearing on application-aware routing - the prioritisation behaviour for Epic, Cerner or PACS/DICOM traffic differs between the platforms BT can deploy. A trust that evaluates BT against one platform's clinical traffic handling, then finds a different platform proposed at contract stage, may find the imaging prioritisation it assessed isn't present in the same form. Confirm the specific platform early and test application-aware routing against your actual traffic profile before signing.
Contact BT via Netify ↗Source evidence
14. Forcepoint
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
FlexEdge Secure SD-WAN combines secure SD-WAN with strong DLP and data security heritage from the wider Forcepoint portfolio.
Proven capability items: 14 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Smaller SD-WAN market presence than the leading platforms.
Contact Forcepoint via Netify ↗Source evidence
15. GTT
Best for: Hospitality and leisure; both
hybrid provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Tier 1 global backbone provides strong international transit capability alongside managed SD-WAN.
Proven capability items: 14 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: SASE depth depends heavily on the chosen platform partner; native SSE capabilities are not primary positioning.
Contact GTT via Netify ↗Source evidence
16. Zscaler
Best for: Retail and e-commerce; Manufacturing; Energy and utilities; Government and public sector; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Category leader in SSE with ZIA, ZPA and ZDX; widely adopted as the security layer in best-of-breed SASE architectures.
Proven capability items: 15 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Historically SSE-led; native SD-WAN capability is less mature than dedicated SD-WAN platforms (validate path selection, QoS and packet loss in RFP).
Contact Zscaler via Netify ↗Source evidence
17. Colt Technology Services
Best for: Financial services; UK and Ireland; Large global enterprise; managed
carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Colt's European data sovereignty positioning is the most direct match to the compliance pillar of any provider in this comparison. Owning the fibre network across European business districts means data-in-transit encryption and localised processing don't depend on a third-party network operator - Colt controls the path the data takes, which makes a DSPT or GDPR data flow mapping exercise more straightforward than where multiple parties are involved.
For trusts where "where does our patient data physically travel" needs a confident, auditable answer, Colt's network ownership model provides that more directly than most managed providers.
Proven capability items: 16 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: That strength is geographically bound. Global delivery depth outside Europe is less developed than the likes of AT&T, Verizon or NTT, so a healthcare network that's primarily European but includes, for instance, a research collaboration site in North America or Asia has that site sitting outside Colt's core strength. The 24/7 resilience and AIOps capability that makes Colt compelling for European sites may not extend with the same maturity to that location, and would need assessing separately.
Contact Colt Technology Services via Netify ↗Source evidence
18. HPE Aruba EdgeConnect
Best for: Healthcare; Financial services; Manufacturing; Professional services; Hospitality and leisure; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
EdgeConnect SD-WAN (acquired with Silver Peak) is positioned as the foundation for single-vendor SASE alongside Aruba SSE.
Proven capability items: 16 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Aruba SSE is newer than the SSE leaders (Zscaler, Netskope); buyers wanting best-of-breed SASE should evaluate the SSE capability set carefully.
Contact HPE Aruba EdgeConnect via Netify ↗Source evidence
19. Vodafone Business
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; UK and Ireland; Large global enterprise; Mid-market; managed
managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Strong UK and European market presence with NaaS positioning and integrated mobile/fixed access.
Proven capability items: 11 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Underlying platform varies by region (VeloCloud in UK, others elsewhere); ensure consistency for multinational deployment.
Contact Vodafone Business via Netify ↗Source evidence
20. NTT DATA
Best for: Retail and e-commerce; Large global enterprise; managed
carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
NTT's global operations centres run 24x7, which aligns closely with how care settings operate - the follow-the-sun handover between centres means there's an active team monitoring at all times, rather than an on-call response after an issue is reported.
The portal visibility NTT provide is also relevant to compliance teams specifically. Trusts needing to demonstrate to auditors how patient data flows are monitored, and where clinical traffic is routed, have that information readily accessible rather than needing to request it on a case-by-case basis - which reduces friction in DSPT evidence-gathering.
Proven capability items: 12 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: NTT's managed service wraps around platforms from the likes of Palo Alto and Zscaler rather than a single NTT-built stack, so the IoMT segmentation and clinical application prioritisation capability available depends on which platform is proposed for the estate. The 24x7 operations model is consistent regardless of platform, but medical device micro-segmentation needs assessing against the specific underlying technology rather than assumed from NTT's overall score.
Contact NTT DATA via Netify ↗Source evidence
21. Verizon Business
Best for: Healthcare (partial evidence); Manufacturing (partial evidence); Large global enterprise; managed
managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Verizon's North American network has been built up over years of supporting emergency services and first responder communications, and the resilience engineering from that work extends into the managed SD-WAN service - relevant for health systems where network downtime carries a direct patient safety dimension rather than being purely an operational inconvenience.
International delivery extends well beyond the US, which is useful for health systems with research, supply chain or partner connections overseas, though the platform underpinning that delivery has implications for clinical traffic handling, covered below.
Proven capability items: 11 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: A largely Versa-based platform has a direct bearing on application-aware routing. Versa's approach to traffic classification is mature, but where a trust's other sites - or a wider integrated care system - run on a different SD-WAN technology, the result is two different application-aware routing logics applied to the same categories of clinical traffic. For a single hospital this is unlikely to matter; for an integrated care system standardising policy across multiple providers, it's a genuine consideration.
Contact Verizon Business via Netify ↗Source evidence
22. Ericsson Cradlepoint
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; both
technology vendor / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Wireless-first branch architecture from Ericsson with deep 5G expertise; NetCloud provides cellular-centric SD-WAN management.
Proven capability items: 11 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: SASE story is partner-integrated rather than native; SSE capabilities require validation in RFP.
Contact Ericsson Cradlepoint via Netify ↗Source evidence
23. Virgin Media O2 Business
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; UK and Ireland; Large global enterprise; managed
managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Managed connectivity and SD-WAN with Zscaler-based SASE; confirm the current contracting entity and scope.
Proven capability items: 10 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out:
Contact Virgin Media O2 Business via Netify ↗Source evidence
24. Cloudflare One
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Cloudflare global edge network provides one of the largest PoP footprints in the category for SASE traffic.
Proven capability items: 10 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Dynamic path selection: supported; QoS and traffic shaping: not confirmed; Packet loss remediation: not confirmed. Confirm branch requirements and any delivery partner dependency.
Contact Cloudflare One via Netify ↗Source evidence
25. Comcast Business
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; managed
managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
The Masergy AIOps heritage gives Comcast Business a monitoring layer built to identify degradation - rising latency, increasing packet loss - before a connection fails outright, rather than after. For a hospital where that connection is carrying PACS imaging to a radiologist or supporting a telehealth consultation, the advance warning is the practical value: rerouting or intervention can happen before the clinical impact occurs, not in response to it.
Combined with fully managed or co-managed delivery, this gives smaller trusts without a large network operations function access to a level of proactive monitoring that larger health systems would otherwise need to build in-house.
Proven capability items: 8 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: The AIOps capability is grounded in North American operational experience. International delivery outside North America runs through partnerships rather than Comcast's own infrastructure, so the monitoring depth evaluated against a North American reference site may not extend in the same form to partner-delivered regions. For any healthcare network with European or wider international sites, it's worth asking specifically how AIOps monitoring is delivered at those locations rather than confirming only that it's available.
Contact Comcast Business via Netify ↗Source evidence
26. VeloCloud
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
VeloCloud was an early SD-WAN platform with strong cloud-delivered gateway architecture; now under Arista following the 2025 acquisition.
Proven capability items: 6 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Platform is mid-transition from VMware/Broadcom to Arista; product roadmap, naming and integration story will evolve.
Contact VeloCloud via Netify ↗Source evidence
27. Expereo
Best for: Manufacturing; Large global enterprise; managed
managed service provider / carrier network provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Managed SD-WAN and internet connectivity, with Cato Networks as a named partner for managed SASE.
Proven capability items: 8 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out:
Contact Expereo via Netify ↗Source evidence
28. Open Systems
Best for: Retail and e-commerce; Manufacturing; both
technology vendor / managed service provider · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
Managed SD-WAN and SASE supported by Open Systems' Mission Control service team.
Proven capability items: 7 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out:
Contact Open Systems via Netify ↗Source evidence
29. Barracuda SecureEdge
Best for: Sector evidence not yet reviewed; platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
SecureEdge combines SD-WAN and cloud security, with an MSP option for multi-tenant management.
Proven capability items: 6 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out:
Contact Barracuda SecureEdge via Netify ↗Source evidence
30. SonicWall Cloud Secure Edge
Best for: Financial services; Professional services (partial evidence); platform
technology vendor · Typical deployment: not_confirmed
SD-WAN delivered via existing TZ, NSa and SM firewall appliances; familiar deployment for organisations standardised on SonicWall.
Proven capability items: 3 · Verification: 2026-09-01
Watch out: Full SASE platform: not confirmed; CASB capability: not confirmed; Data loss prevention: not confirmed. Confirm the exact networking and security modules included in the proposal.
Contact SonicWall Cloud Secure Edge via Netify ↗
All researched providers are ordered by evidence coverage, highest first, then name. Coverage is the proportion of capability fields carrying an evidence grade; it is not fit, quality or a recommendation. Commission does not affect this order. Research and evidence matching are open.
Cite this research
Netify, "Best SD-WAN and SASE providers for Healthcare (2026)", Netify SASE and SD-WAN comparison, updated 29 July 2026: https://netify.co.uk/sase/best/sd-wan-sase-providers-for-healthcare
Machine-readable version: https://netify.co.uk/sase/best/sd-wan-sase-providers-for-healthcare/data.json · Programmatic access: POST https://netify.co.uk/sase/api/mcp/ (tool: build_sase_shortlist)
Questions
About this evidence
Does inclusion confirm suitability for my project?
No. This directory presents published provider evidence. Confirm product, sector, region and service scope against your own requirements. Missing evidence remains unconfirmed.
How is the public directory ordered?
Most proven capability items first, then the most recent verification date, then provider name; slug breaks identical names and missing dates come last. Only yes capability grades count. This is evidence order, not a personalised recommendation.
What does Netify do?
Netify reviews your requirement, agrees a sourcing plan, approaches the providers you approve and coordinates written responses. A full RFP is optional.
More provider research