NNetify
Skip to main content

Editorial transparency

Editorial Policy, Corrections and Vendor Scoring Methodology

How Netify funds its publication, keeps its scoring independent of commercial relationships, and ranks SD-WAN and SASE vendors using verified engineering data.

Transparency notice: Netify earns commissions for introductions made via our marketplace. This funding supports our research and never dictates our editorial conclusions.

Scope and transparency: Netify is not a network or security service provider and does not certify compliance. We translate common requirements (for example NHS DSPT, HIPAA, clinical safety expectations) into procurement questions, and require suppliers to evidence their claims. Final compliance decisions remain with the buyer and their appointed advisors.

Our role

Netify Insights is an editorial publication operated by Netify. Netify is an intermediary marketplace and does not provide SD-WAN or SASE services, does not resell those services directly, and does not certify compliance. Buyers contract directly with suppliers.

How we fund the publication

Netify may earn commissions for introductions made via the marketplace. Our publication is also supported by professional subscriptions. Funding does not influence editorial conclusions or marketplace scoring.

Independence and conflicts of interest

Sources and evidence standard

We prefer primary sources including vendor documentation, standards bodies, and regulators. We cite these sources within our articles. Worked examples include our market guide to ZTNA services and our review of the top 10 managed cloud service providers.

Our methodology distinguishes between verified public sources, supplier statements, and editorial opinion. For any framework references (for example DSPT or HIPAA) we provide framework-aligned discussion and questions; we do not provide legal or compliance advice.

Reviews and updates

We maintain a quarterly review cadence for evergreen guides to ensure technical and regulatory accuracy. Major articles include a "Last reviewed" label. If a material change is made to an article, we append a change-log note to the bottom of the content.

Corrections

If you spot an error, please report it to support@netify.com. We acknowledge reports within 48 hours, review the evidence, and issue corrections with a visible note if the error was material.

Corrections log

No corrections logged yet.

Contact

Editorial inbox: support@netify.com. For general enquiries see Contact Netify.

Policy version: v1.0. Last updated: 5 February 2026.


ALGORITHM V2.4

Vendor Scoring Framework

Netify ranks providers using verified engineering data. We combine latency metrics, security validation and commercial benchmarking to calculate the Netify Score.

The Netify Score

A generic rating is useless for specific projects. We calculate unique suitability scores derived from three primary data clusters.

Technical Fit (40%)

Network physics: PoP density, backbone throughput, packet loss guarantees and protocol optimisation.

Security Stack (35%)

SASE components: ZTNA, SWG, CASB and FWaaS integration levels. Native versus third-party partnerships.

Commercial Value (25%)

Total cost of ownership analysis. Licensing benchmarks and hidden costs such as support tiers.

Sector-specific weighting

A vendor ranked as a Leader for Retail may rank as a Challenger for Finance. Our algorithm adjusts weighting based on six industry compliance models.

Financial services. Primary: latency

PoP density in trading hubs. FCA alignment and data residency controls.

Healthcare. Primary: IoMT security

Medical device segmentation. NHS DSP Toolkit and HIPAA compliance.

Retail. Primary: uptime

4G or 5G failover for EPOS continuity. Native PCI DSS compliance.

Manufacturing. Primary: global backbone

APAC production reach without public internet loss. OT security mandatory.

Legal. Primary: confidentiality

Granular DLP rules with file transfer restrictions by matter codes.

Logistics. Primary: mobility

Mobile SASE for handheld scanners and fleet telematics.

Last reviewed: 5 February 2026.