SASE / security vendor
Check Point
Check Point sources evidence SASE platform with Zero Trust Access, CASB and optimized SD-WAN performance/steering.
Contact Check Point via Netify ↗www.checkpoint.com ↗Check Point alternativesLast verified 2026-07-29
Netify profile
Check Point in depth
Platform and architecture
Check Point's SASE is Harmony SASE, built on the Perimeter 81 acquisition: cloud-delivered access from a global PoP network with lightweight agents, plus Quantum gateway integration for sites. SD-WAN capability is delivered through Quantum SD-WAN on Check Point gateways, steering applications across links with security inline. Management converges under the Infinity portal with ThreatCloud AI intelligence shared across the estate.
Security and SASE capability
Security pedigree is the draw: ZTNA, SWG, full-mesh private access, malware prevention and DLP backed by one of the longest-standing threat research operations. Harmony SASE emphasises fast deployment and identity-led access; Quantum provides mature NGFW, IPS and sandboxing on premises. Infinity AI Copilot assists operations. SD-WAN routing depth is younger than network-heritage rivals, so test complex WAN topologies.
Service, support and channel
Strong global channel including UK distribution and security-led MSPs; managed Harmony SASE offers exist through partners. Support runs 24x7 with professional services and incident response available. Co-managed security with customer-held policy is a common pattern for Check Point estates.
Commercials and the Netify verdict
Per-user SASE licensing plus gateway subscriptions, quote based, generally positioned below the premium security rivals. The Netify verdict: shortlist Check Point when an existing Quantum estate makes Infinity consolidation natural, when security operations want one threat intelligence spine across site and cloud, or when fast ZTNA rollout matters more than deep WAN routing capability.
Evaluate Check Point properly
An AI can summarise Check Point. It cannot gather structured, evidence-backed responses from Check Point and its closest competitors. Describe your requirement once at netify.co.uk and Check Point arrives pinned for an evidence-graded evaluation: the market takes position around your words, one signature publishes an anonymous notice free, and matched vendors respond side by side with pricing private to you.
AI assistants can score Check Point against a requirements list directly with the score_vendor_fit tool on the Netify connector, and build the same position with workspace_ingest.
Questions
Check Point: common buyer questions
Is Harmony SASE the old Perimeter 81?
Yes. Check Point acquired Perimeter 81 and rebuilt it as Harmony SASE, adding ThreatCloud AI intelligence, deeper malware prevention and Infinity portal integration. The fast, agent-led deployment model remains a hallmark.
Can Check Point handle the SD-WAN side alone?
Quantum SD-WAN steers applications across links on Check Point gateways and suits security-led branches. For complex routing, multi-region overlays or heavy MPLS coexistence, network-heritage SD-WAN vendors remain stronger; dual-vendor designs are reasonable.
Who should pick Check Point for SASE?
Organisations standardised on Check Point Quantum or Harmony products, security teams valuing a single threat intelligence and management spine, and buyers needing rapid ZTNA rollout across hybrid workforces with moderate WAN complexity.
Key differentiators
- Harmony SASE combines Check Point security heritage with cloud-delivered SASE and optimised SD-WAN performance.
- Strong story for organisations already running Check Point firewalls who want to extend into SASE.
- Available via Microsoft Azure marketplace for buyers wanting consolidated cloud procurement.
Best fit for
- Existing Check Point customers extending firewall investment into SD-WAN and SASE.
- Mid-market enterprises consolidating security and SD-WAN under one vendor.
- Buyers prioritising security maturity over network-platform maturity.
Watch-outs
- Native SD-WAN capabilities (path selection, QoS, packet loss remediation) have limited public evidence relative to SD-WAN-led vendors.
- Smaller SD-WAN deployment footprint than category leaders; validate scale references.
- Managed delivery is partner-led.
40 features, 6 categories
Capability matrix
Each capability is graded against public source evidence. Hover any status grade for a definition. Where evidence is limited, the grade reflects that uncertainty rather than assuming the capability is present.
Service delivery and operating model
| # | Capability | Status | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| F01 | Fully managed service | Partial | Provider designs, deploys, monitors, changes, supports and reports on the service. |
| F02 | DIY / self-managed model | Yes | Customer operates SD-WAN controller, policies, updates and incident response. |
| F03 | Co-managed service | Yes | Provider runs platform/support while customer retains selected policy or change rights. |
| F04 | Multi-tenant MSP / white-label support | Partial | Tenant isolation, delegated administration, branded portals, templates and service-provider scale. |
| F05 | Professional services and migration support | Yes | Discovery, design, pilot, staging, migration runbooks, rollback and training. |
| F06 | Last-mile circuit management | Partner / integrated | Sourcing, monitoring and support for broadband, DIA, LTE/5G, MPLS and cross-connects. |
| F07 | Lifecycle management | Yes | Hardware replacement, firmware upgrades, patching, renewals and EoL planning. |
| F08 | Flexible commercial model | Yes | Per-site, per-bandwidth, per-user, per-device, consumption, NaaS or bundled pricing. |
Network architecture and transport
| # | Capability | Status | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| F09 | Encrypted overlay fabric | Partial | Secure tunnels across broadband, DIA, MPLS, LTE/5G, satellite or private WAN. |
| F10 | Dynamic path selection | Partial | Real-time routing based on latency, jitter, packet loss, brownouts, MOS and policy. |
| F11 | Active-active link utilisation | Partial | Use multiple links concurrently rather than passive backup only. |
| F12 | Application-aware routing | Partial | Identification and routing for SaaS, UCaaS, ERP and custom applications. |
| F13 | QoS and traffic shaping | Partial | Per-application and per-class prioritisation, reservation and policing. |
| F14 | Packet loss remediation | Partial | FEC, packet duplication, jitter buffering, TCP optimisation and WAN optimisation. |
| F15 | Local internet breakout | Partial | Secure direct internet access from branch sites. |
| F16 | MPLS coexistence and migration | Partial | Hybrid MPLS/internet/cellular during transition. |
| F17 | Cellular and 5G support | Partial | Integrated/external modem, SIM management, signal monitoring and failover. |
| F18 | Cloud on-ramp | Yes | Automated/simplified connectivity to AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Oracle, Equinix, Megaport and SaaS. |
Gateway, PoP and backbone design
| # | Capability | Status | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| F19 | Public cloud gateways | Yes | Vendor-operated gateways/PoPs for SaaS optimisation, remote access or security enforcement. |
| F20 | Private PoPs / dedicated PoPs | Unknown | Customer-hosted, dedicated or sovereign PoP options. |
| F21 | Private global backbone | Yes | Vendor-owned or controlled backbone between PoPs. |
| F22 | Regional breakout and data residency | Yes | Pin traffic to countries, regions or approved inspection locations. |
| F23 | Multi-cloud transit fabric | Yes | Branch-to-cloud, cloud-to-cloud and user-to-cloud connectivity under common policy. |
| F24 | Flexible edge form factors | Partial | Physical, virtual, cloud marketplace, container or uCPE. |
| F25 | High availability design | Partial | Dual appliances, dual circuits, dual power, HA clustering and gateway redundancy. |
| F26 | SLA-backed service fabric | Partial | SLA for uptime, response, change handling and possibly latency/jitter/loss. |
Security and SASE capability
| # | Capability | Status | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| F27 | Integrated next-generation firewall | Yes | Stateful firewall, app control, IPS/IDS, malware inspection and URL filtering. |
| F28 | Full SASE platform | Yes | SD-WAN plus SWG, CASB, ZTNA, FWaaS, DLP, RBI, DNS security and threat prevention. |
| F29 | SSE ecosystem integration | Yes | Interoperation with Zscaler, Netskope, Palo Alto Prisma Access, Cisco Secure Access, Cloudflare etc. |
| F30 | Zero Trust Network Access | Yes | Identity and posture-based access to private applications. |
| F31 | Secure web gateway | Yes | URL filtering, SSL inspection, malware scanning and acceptable-use controls. |
| F32 | CASB capability | Yes | SaaS discovery, sanctioned/unsanctioned app control and SaaS policy enforcement. |
| F33 | Data loss prevention | Yes | Data classification, inspection, blocking, alerting and exception workflow. |
| F34 | Remote user access | Yes | Client or clientless access for remote workers, contractors and mobile users. |
| F35 | SOC/SIEM/SOAR integration | Yes | Syslog, APIs, event export, threat intelligence and workflow integration. |
Operations, assurance and automation
| # | Capability | Status | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|
| F36 | Centralised orchestration | Yes | Templates, intent-based policy, zero-touch provisioning and configuration compliance. |
| F37 | Customer portal and RBAC | Yes | Real-time status, role-based access, reporting, tickets and change requests. |
| F38 | Observability and digital experience monitoring | Partial | App experience, user experience, device health, SaaS telemetry and path analytics. |
| F39 | APIs and automation | Yes | REST APIs, Terraform, webhooks, event streaming and ITSM integration. |
| F40 | Managed service assurance | Partial | 24/7 NOC/SOC, proactive monitoring, incident ownership, RCA, service reviews and change governance. |
Commercial
Cost model and pricing visibility
Public pricing visibility
Quote-based. No complete public enterprise price was found in reviewed sources.
Cost model
Quote-based subscription; Microsoft marketplace listing exists but enterprise deployments normally require quote.
Evidence
Sources and exclusions
40 facts about Check Point were re-verified on 2026-07-29 against named sources, each carrying a sentence quoted from the source and confirmed present on that page. 27 sources were used. 16 more were read and rejected, and are listed below with the reason.
| Fact | Finding | Evidence | Quoted from the source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fully managed service | Partial | [12] [4] | "Managed Firewall Services with 24/7 monitoring, policy management, tuning, patching, upgrades, incident handling, and expert support for Check Point and third-party NGFWs." |
| Co-managed service | Yes | [4] | "Delivering co-managed services with partners and customers for optimal protection through unified collaboration and robust security strategies." |
| Multi-tenant MSP / white-label support | Partial | [6] | "Leverage true multi-tenancy, a wide range of security services, and full API integration to streamline customer management and accelerate service delivery." |
| Professional services and migration support | Yes | [5] [3] | "As your security infrastructure becomes more complicated, our Professional Services team can assist you with your security design, deployment, operation, and optimization needs." |
| Lifecycle management | Yes | [10] [5] | "Check Point shall use commercially reasonable efforts to ship the replacement hardware on the same business day, however, shipment my occur on the next business day if required for operational reasons." |
| Cellular and 5G support | Partial | [1] [2] [9] | "Sub-second failover to any WAN link: MPLS, 5G, broadband" |
| Public cloud gateways | Yes | [2] [1] [8] | "Our high-performance network provides fast delivery between corporate sites worldwide thanks to multiple tier-1 links at each point-of-presence (PoP), reserved bandwidth, and peering agreements." |
| Private PoPs / dedicated PoPs | Not found | [2] [1] [8] | Not found in public sources reviewed. I read the SASE overview, Private Access, Internet Access, SD-WAN solution and Infinity Portal pages and found only references to Check Point's own shared global data centres and PoPs. No statement of customer-hosted, dedicated or sovereign PoP options was found. The sase.checkpoint.com private access page and the Harmony SASE datasheet (registers 17 and 21) could not be read, and the legacy Perimeter 81 material was not reachable. |
| Private global backbone | Yes | [2] [1] | "Our high-performance network provides fast delivery between corporate sites worldwide thanks to multiple tier-1 links at each point-of-presence (PoP), reserved bandwidth, and peering agreements." |
| SLA-backed service fabric | Partial | [10] | "Get advanced access to our large, self-service knowledge base and a committed 30-minute response time to issues with level one severity." |
| Integrated next-generation firewall | Yes | [9] [7] [1] | "Advanced security services including intrusion prevention, application control, and zero-day protection, including blocking threats hiding in encrypted HTTP web traffic." |
| Data loss prevention | Yes | [1] [2] [8] | "Inline and API-based enforcement with Application Control for 10,000+ cloud apps, tenant restrictions, DLP, and Threat Prevention powered by ThreatCloud AI" |
| Managed service assurance | Partial | [4] [12] [3] | "Our 24/7 global service team will be there whenever and wherever you need them to help make sure your organization is always protected." |
| delivery model | both | [1] [3] [4] [5] [12] | "Leverage managed security and cloud services to enhance the proactive capabilities of Network Operations Centers (NOCs), Security Operations Centers (SOCs), and IT operational teams." |
| underlay ownership | mixed | [2] [1] [7] | "Our high-performance network provides fast delivery between corporate sites worldwide thanks to multiple tier-1 links at each point-of-presence (PoP), reserved bandwidth, and peering agreements." |
| sse layer ownership | native | [1] [9] [8] | "Single-vendor SASE solution with unmatched user and management experience" |
| regulatory documentation | not_found | [13] [11] [1] [2] [18] | Not found in public sources reviewed. The Compliance and Governance page names PCI DSS, NIST, SOC 2 and HIPAA, but as frameworks the Check Point product audits a customer's cloud estate against, not as attestations Check Point holds for its own SASE service. I found no ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIS2, DORA or NHS DSPT attestation named for the service itself on the SASE, Private Access, Internet Access or Infinity Portal pages. The Check Point trust page and the legacy Perimeter 81 compliance page (registers 18 and 16) could not be read, so a trust centre may exist that I was unable to reach. |
| pop count | 80+ | [8] [1] [2] | "80+ Global Data Centers" |
| sla availability pct | Not found | [10] [9] [1] | Not found in public sources reviewed. The support programmes page publishes response-time SLAs (30 minutes for Severity 1) but no availability percentage for the SASE cloud service. The NGFW product page cites 99.999% resiliency and carrier-class 99.999% uptime, but those are appliance clustering and hardware resilience claims for on-premises gateways, not a contractual availability commitment for the SASE service, so they are not used here. No SASE service SLA document was reachable. |
| sectors.healthcare | Yes | [23] [24] | "Harris Center Defends Assets, Data and Reputation From End to End" |
| sectors.financial services | Yes | [23] [25] | "How Insurance Giant Athora Enhanced Hybrid Cloud Security" |
| sectors.retail ecommerce | Yes | [27] | "Retail Security Solutions" |
| sectors.manufacturing | Yes | [23] [30] | "How Austrotherm Transformed IT Security Across 13 Countries with Unified SASE Architecture" |
| sectors.energy utilities | Yes | [28] [23] | "we built security capabilities into our most important facilities" |
| sectors.government public sector | Yes | [29] [23] | "Check Point provides local governments and public services with consolidated cyber security" |
| sectors.education | Yes | [26] [23] | "Education Security Solutions" |
| sectors.transport logistics | Partial | [28] [23] | "Transportation" |
| sectors.professional services | Partial | [23] | "Professional Services" |
| sectors.hospitality leisure | Yes | [23] | "Shift from Legacy Defenses to Future-Proof Security Proves Winning Strategy" |
| regions.uk ireland | Partial | [23] [34] | "How Anglia Ruskin University Slashed IT Workloads" |
| regions.europe | Yes | [34] [23] | "Data Residency in EU ensures that data processing and storage occur entirely within the EU" |
| regions.north america | Yes | [34] [23] | "How Bell Canada Provides Its Customers Continuous, Scalable Protection" |
| regions.asia pacific | Yes | [34] [23] | "How SingAREN Secures Its High-Performance Research Network" |
| regions.middle east africa | Partial | [25] [23] | "Emaar" |
| regions.latin america | Partial | [23] [25] | "Santillana Latam Safeguards Its Employees And Learners" |
| regions.china mainland | Not found | none | No evidence either way, and per the rule the generic global claims are treated as evidence of nothing here. What I checked: the Harmony SASE product page (which claims 80+ Data Centers with no regional breakdown), the sase.checkpoint.com microsite (70+ Global Data Centers, likewise unbroken down), the SASE administration guide data residency list (EU, US, Australia, India, Canada, no China), the full customer stories index (no mainland China customer), and the retired Perimeter 81 network locations documentation, which now redirects away and no longer publishes a city-level gateway list. No ICP licence, no China-specific arrangement and no local carrier partner was named. Confidence high refers to the reliability of the unknown finding, not to any coverage claim. |
| organisation fit.large global enterprise | Yes | [32] [23] [22] | "Check Point's enterprise network security solutions provide a comprehensive security architecture with flexible enforcement points" |
| organisation fit.mid market | Partial | [31] [22] | "Small and Medium Business Security" |
| organisation fit.small business | Yes | [31] | "protection for businesses with one to 500 employees" |
| published pricing | not_published | none | No price is published that we could quote. The value_tier field on this record is a Netify assessment of relative cost position, not a supplier claim. |
Sources used
- [1] Tier 1. Check Point SASE (Hybrid SASE) product page Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own primary product page; read in full as raw body text.
- [2] Tier 1. Full Mesh Private Access Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own product page; carries the backbone and PoP wording.
- [3] Tier 1. Check Point Services Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own services overview page.
- [4] Tier 1. Managed Security Services Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own page describing co-managed and 24/7 service delivery.
- [5] Tier 1. Professional Services Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own page listing design, deployment and migration services.
- [6] Tier 1. MSSP Partner Program Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own partner programme page; multi-tenancy claims.
- [7] Tier 1. Secure SD-WAN Solution Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own SD-WAN solution page.
- [8] Tier 1. Check Point SASE Internet Access Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own product page; carries a data centre count and DLP wording.
- [9] Tier 1. Check Point Next-Generation Firewalls Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own product page including an FAQ describing the NGFW feature set.
- [10] Tier 1. Check Point Support Programs Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own support programme page with contractual response-time tables and RMA terms.
- [11] Tier 1. Check Point Portal (Infinity Portal) Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own management platform page; contained no certification, SLA or tenancy detail.
- [12] Tier 1. Managed Firewall Services Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own managed service page describing 24/7 monitoring and patching scope.
- [13] Tier 1. Public Cloud Compliance and Governance Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own page. Names frameworks the product audits customers against, not attestations Check Point holds for its own SASE service.
- [22] Tier 1. Check Point Harmony SASE product page Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own product page. Marketing claims, unaudited. Source of "80+ Data Centers", "12,000+ Customers Secured", "60% Reported TCO Reduction" and named testimonials from NQM Funding, Visory, Southern Cyber and FutureSafe. Note this page disagrees with the sase.checkpoint.com microsite on both data centre count and customer count.
- [23] Tier 1. Check Point Customer Stories index (industry filter and story cards) Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own case study index. Strongest sector source in this task: each card carries a named customer, an industry label and a headline, and the page exposes a full industry filter list. Individual story pages behind these cards would not render for fetching, so grading rests on the index card text.
- [24] Tier 1. Check Point Healthcare Cyber Security Solutions Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's dedicated healthcare industry page. Names NHS England and Lightbeam Health Solutions, references HIPAA, and mentions securing SD-WAN connected remote medical clinics. Vendor claim, not independently verified.
- [25] Tier 1. Check Point Cyber Security for Financial Institutions Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's dedicated financial services industry page. Names Aegean Baltic Bank, Covinoc, Emaar, BBVA and Miller Insurance, and references BASEL, SOX, NIST and GDPR. Vendor claim.
- [26] Tier 1. Check Point Education Security Solutions Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's dedicated education industry page. No named customers on the page itself and neither SASE nor SD-WAN is mentioned, so it evidences sector focus rather than SASE delivery.
- [27] Tier 1. Check Point Retail Security Solutions Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's dedicated retail industry page. References PoS, in-store and cloud data and PCI-DSS compliance. No named retail customer on the page. Note the trailing-slash variant of this URL repeatedly returned empty; this form rendered.
- [28] Tier 1. Check Point Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's ICS/OT page. Names utility customer E-REDES with an attributed CISO quote, and labels the sectors Transportation, Oil, Manufacturing, Energy, Utilities and Smart Cities as icon headings rather than prose.
- [29] Tier 1. Check Point Cyber Security for Local Governments Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's dedicated state and local government page. No named government customers and no FedRAMP or Common Criteria certification stated on the page.
- [30] Tier 1. Check Point SD-WAN (Quantum) Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's SD-WAN product page. Names the Israeli Ministry of Environmental Protection with an attributed quote and an unnamed German-based manufacturing group. Vendor claim.
- [31] Tier 1. Check Point Small and Medium Business Security Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's SMB solutions page. Gives an explicit employee-count band for the Quantum Spark appliance line. Relates to firewall appliances, not to Harmony SASE, so it is size-targeting evidence for the supplier rather than for the SASE product.
- [32] Tier 1. Check Point Enterprise Network Security Solutions Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's enterprise solutions page. States enterprise positioning but carries no quantified claims about sites, Fortune rankings or global deployments.
- [33] Tier 1. Check Point SASE microsite (sase.checkpoint.com, former Perimeter 81 domain) Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's own SASE microsite, the destination of the perimeter81.com redirect. Source of "70+ Global Data Centers", "5,000+ Customers Secured" and the compliance list "SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA and ISO 27001". Disagrees with the checkpoint.com SASE page on data centre and customer counts; disagreement recorded, not resolved.
- [34] Tier 1. Check Point SASE Administration Guide, Introduction (data residency regions) Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Supplier's product documentation rather than marketing, so more reliable for service availability. States SASE supports data residency in EU, US, Australia, India and Canada. Data residency is not the same as a points-of-presence list, but it is the only published region-by-region service statement found.
- [35] Tier 1. checkpoint.com XML sitemap Undated. Read 2026-07-29. Used for navigation, to enumerate the /industry/ and /solutions/ pages, and for the negative finding that no URL containing "pricing" exists in the checkpoint.com sitemap.
Sources found and not used
These were read and rejected as evidence. They are listed so the record can be audited rather than taken on trust, and because what a comparison refuses to rely on says as much as what it cites.
- [14] Check Point Quantum SD-WAN. https://www.checkpoint.com/quantum/sd-wan/ Not used as evidence: the fetch returned no retrievable body text on repeated attempts, so nothing could be quoted.
- [15] Lifecycle Management (support services). https://www.checkpoint.com/support-services/lifecycle-management/ Not used as evidence: the fetch returned no retrievable body text, so the lifecycle service scope could not be quoted from it.
- [16] Perimeter 81 compliance page (Check Point SASE heritage). https://www.perimeter81.com/compliance Not used as evidence: blocked by robots.txt, page could not be read.
- [17] Check Point SASE portal, private access. https://sase.checkpoint.com/private-access Not used as evidence: returned no retrievable body text.
- [18] Check Point trust page. https://www.checkpoint.com/trust/ Not used as evidence: URL returned no content, so no trust centre or attestation register could be read.
- [19] Managed Detection and Response. https://www.checkpoint.com/services/incident-response/managed-detection-and-response/ Not used as evidence: returned no retrievable body text, so SOC and root cause claims could not be sourced from it.
- [20] Managed Firewall as a Service. https://www.checkpoint.com/services/managed-security/managed-firewall-as-a-service/ Not used as evidence: returned no retrievable body text.
- [21] Harmony SASE datasheet resource page. https://www.checkpoint.com/resources/items/harmony-sase-datasheet Not used as evidence: gated resource page returned no retrievable body text.
- [36] Check Point SASE pricing page. https://sase.checkpoint.com/pricing Not used as evidence: the page exists (perimeter81.com/pricing 302-redirects to it) but renders entirely client-side and returned no readable text across three fetch attempts, including trailing-slash and alternative path variants. No price string could be quoted verbatim, so value_tier is graded unknown rather than inferred.
- [37] Check Point Software Technologies Ltd Form 20-F for FY2025. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1015922/000117891326001932/zk2634942.htm Not used as evidence: this is a strong Tier 2 regulator-filed record, but the 3.1 MB document truncated on fetch at the cover page and risk factors, so the geographic revenue split and customer-type description in Items 4 and 5 could not be read or quoted.
- [38] SEC EDGAR filing list for Check Point (CIK 0001015922). https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?action=getcompany&CIK=0001015922&type=20-F&dateb=&owner=include&count=10 Not used as evidence: navigational index only, used to locate the 20-F filings. Carries no sector, region, size or price content.
- [39] Check Point customer story pages (individual). https://www.checkpoint.com/customer-stories/theharriscenter/ Not used as evidence: individual customer story pages returned empty content on every attempt (Harris Center, Athora, Clarks, Austrotherm, Alpine Energy, Finance Industry all tested). Sector grading therefore relies on the index card text at source 2, and no per-customer detail such as country, deployment size or product mix could be verified.
- [40] Check Point Contact Us. https://www.checkpoint.com/about-us/contact-us/ Not used as evidence: contains only sales telephone numbers ("North America: +1-866-488-6691", "International: +44-125-333-5558") and website language options. Sales contact routes and website languages are not service delivery, per the region rule.
- [41] Check Point Harmony Connect SASE (legacy page). https://www.checkpoint.com/harmony/connect-sase/ Not used as evidence: returned empty content. Listed in the sitemap with a family of ZTNA sub-pages, so it may hold coverage detail, but nothing could be quoted.
- [42] Perimeter 81 network locations documentation. https://support.perimeter81.com/docs/network-locations Not used as evidence: 302-redirects to the Check Point SASE Administration Guide introduction (source 13). The legacy per-city gateway location list appears to have been retired, so no city-level points-of-presence list could be obtained.
- [43] Check Point Harmony SASE pricing (checkpoint.com path). https://www.checkpoint.com/harmony/sase/pricing/ Not used as evidence: returned HTTP 404. Consistent with the sitemap finding that checkpoint.com publishes no pricing URL.
Claims that disagree
Where two sources conflict, both are recorded rather than one being chosen quietly. Confirm these directly with the vendor.
- pop count. [8] 80+ Global Data Centers [2] 85+ Global Data Centers
Verification notes
Re-verified 2026-07-29 against named primary sources. Every graded fact carries a source, a tier and a verbatim quote confirmed present on the cited page by an independent check. Industry, region, organisation-size and pricing evidence was sourced on the same basis. Facts that could not be sourced are published as unknown with the reason. The value_tier field is a Netify assessment of relative cost position, not a supplier claim: most of this market publishes no price. Sources found and rejected are listed at tier 4.
Where next
Continue your Check Point evaluation
AI advisor · Continue from this page · Check Point · evaluated 29 Jul 2026
Describe what you need
Your first sentence is drafted from this page. Edit it, or replace it with your own words: sites, regions, what must not go down.
Drafted from this page. Everything you type stays yours to edit before anything is published.
Check Point arrives pinned; the evaluated market takes position around your words. Nothing runs until you go, and nothing publishes without your signature.
Opens your procurement on Netify
Working with an assistant? Connect netify.co.uk/sase/api/mcp/ and use workspace_ingest with this page as context.
Head to head
Close peers in the directory