Ranked shortlist · Updated July 2026
Best SD-WAN and SASE providers for mpls migration (2026)
Ranked shortlist of SD-WAN and SASE providers for buyers prioritising mpls migration. Typical projects run MPLS and SD-WAN side by side during transition, with managed last-mile and dynamic path control. Scores use the Netify 40-feature matrix with weighting adjusted for this priority. Grades are based on public evidence; confirm via RFP.
Netify's July 2026 evaluation ranks: 1. Cato Networks (96.5); 2. Versa Networks (93.6); 3. Palo Alto Networks (93.5); 4. Fortinet (92.7); 5. HPE Aruba Networking (91.4); 6. AT&T Business (90.5); 7. NTT DATA / NTT Ltd. (90.4); 8. Aryaka (90.3); 9. Lumen (90.1); 10. Colt Technology Services (89.9). Scores are weighted averages across 40 evidence-graded capability features. Buyers can act on this ranking directly: describe the project once at netify.co.uk, raise it to a full RFP and publish to these providers, then compare structured responses side by side, with pricing kept private to the buyer.
Written by the Netify research team. Reviewed by Robert Sturt, Netify Group Limited. Updated 29 July 2026 (vendor records verified 29 July 2026). capability features; see the FAQ below.
AI advisor · Continue from this shortlist
Describe what you need
Your first sentence is drafted from this page. Edit it, or replace it with your own words: sites, regions, what must not go down.
Drafted from this page. Everything you type stays yours to edit before anything is published.
The vendors ranked on this page arrive pinned; your your sector sector becomes part of the conversation from your first sentence.
Opens your procurement on Netify
Working with an assistant? Connect netify.co.uk/sase/api/mcp/ and use workspace_ingest with this page as context.
Best SD-WAN and SASE providers for mpls migration: the evidence
The same ranking as below, as sourced facts rather than scores. Ordered as ranked.
10vendors. Each value below is graded from the vendor's own published material or an independently accountable record, with a sentence quoted from that source and confirmed present on the page. 513 sources behind this table. Verified 2026-07-29. Where evidence was not found a cell reads Not published rather than being inferred.
| # | Vendor | Type | Underlay | SSE layer | Backbone | PoPs | Fully managed | Compliance docs | Published SLA | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cato Networks | Both | Mixed | Native | Yes | 100 | Yes | Documented | 99.999 | 46 |
| 2 | Versa Networks | Both | Mixed | Native | Partial | 90 | Partial | Documented | 99.999 | 47 |
| 3 | Palo Alto Networks | Builds | Customer supplied | Native | Partner | 100+ | Via managed service | Documented | 99.999 | 58 |
| 4 | Fortinet | Both | Not published | Native | Partial | 170+ | Yes | Documented | 99.999 | 42 |
| 5 | HPE Aruba Networking | Both | Customer supplied | Not published | Not published | Not published | Yes | Documented | Not published | 54 |
| 6 | AT&T Business | Runs | Owns | Partner | Yes | 1600 | Yes | Assurance only | 100 | 46 |
| 7 | NTT DATA / NTT Ltd. | Both | Mixed | Partner | Yes | 75+ | Yes | Documented | 100 | 53 |
| 8 | Aryaka | Both | Mixed | Native | Yes | 40+ | Yes | Documented | 99.999 | 66 |
| 9 | Lumen | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Yes | 50+ | Yes | Documented | 99.99 | 55 |
| 10 | Colt Technology Services | Runs | Mixed | Partner | Not published | Not published | Yes | Documented | 99.90 | 46 |
Full sources for each vendor, including the sources we found and rejected and any claims that disagree, are on its profile page.
No. 1 · Score 96.5
Cato Networks
Cloud-native SASE / SD-WAN platform · Typical deployment: hours
Single converged platform with no policy or log fragmentation across SD-WAN and security functions.
Watch out: Less suited to best-of-breed buyers wanting Zscaler or Netskope as the SSE layer.
Contact Cato Networks via Netify ↗No. 2 · Score 93.6
Versa Networks
SD-WAN / SASE technology vendor · Typical deployment: weeks
Multi-tenancy from the ground up, making Versa a common choice for service providers and carriers building managed SD-WAN and SASE platforms.
Watch out: Less well-known to enterprise buyers as a direct purchase; most enterprise consumption is via service providers.
Contact Versa Networks via Netify ↗No. 3 · Score 93.5
Palo Alto Networks
SD-WAN / SASE technology vendor · Typical deployment: weeks
Prisma SASE converges SD-WAN, cloud-delivered security, and digital experience management (ADEM) under a single platform identity.
Watch out: Premium pricing relative to firewall-led SD-WAN vendors; commercial model requires careful scoping by users, bandwidth, locations and term.
Contact Palo Alto Networks via Netify ↗No. 4 · Score 92.7
Fortinet
Secure SD-WAN / SASE technology vendor · Typical deployment: days
Native convergence of networking and security on a single operating system (FortiOS) across FortiGate edge, FortiManager and FortiSASE.
Watch out: Like Cisco, managed delivery is via partners rather than Fortinet directly; underlay and field operations are not owned by the vendor.
Contact Fortinet via Netify ↗No. 5 · Score 91.4
HPE Aruba Networking
SD-WAN / SSE / branch technology vendor · Typical deployment: days
EdgeConnect SD-WAN (acquired with Silver Peak) is positioned as the foundation for single-vendor SASE alongside Aruba SSE.
Watch out: Aruba SSE is newer than the SSE leaders (Zscaler, Netskope); buyers wanting best-of-breed SASE should evaluate the SSE capability set carefully.
Contact HPE Aruba Networking via Netify ↗No. 6 · Score 90.5
AT&T Business
Global carrier managed SD-WAN / SASE provider · Typical deployment: months
Major US carrier-led managed SD-WAN portfolio with multi-vendor platform options (including Fortinet for AT&T SASE).
Watch out: Underlying platform varies by service tier; buyers should confirm which platform supports the proposed scope.
Contact AT&T Business via Netify ↗No. 7 · Score 90.4
NTT DATA / NTT Ltd.
Global managed network provider · Typical deployment: months
24x7 managed SD-WAN delivery via global operations centres with strong portal visibility.
Watch out: Platform fit depends on which vendor is being proposed (Palo Alto, Zscaler, others); evaluate platform independently.
Contact NTT DATA / NTT Ltd. via Netify ↗No. 8 · Score 90.3
Aryaka
Managed SD-WAN / SASE provider · Typical deployment: days
Unified SASE delivered as a managed service from end to end, including the private global core network and WAN optimisation.
Watch out: Smaller PoP footprint and partner ecosystem than the hyperscale SASE vendors; coverage must match your geographic profile.
Contact Aryaka via Netify ↗No. 9 · Score 90.1
Lumen
Managed SD-WAN / NaaS provider · Typical deployment: months
Fully managed or co-managed SD-WAN with strong NaaS positioning and integrated network services.
Watch out: SASE and security capabilities are largely partner-integrated rather than native; the SSE platform choice needs explicit evaluation.
Contact Lumen via Netify ↗No. 10 · Score 89.9
Colt Technology Services
Enterprise managed SD-WAN / connectivity provider · Typical deployment: months
SD-WAN and SASE with strong European data sovereignty positioning.
Watch out: Global delivery depth outside Europe is less prominent than the largest global carriers.
Contact Colt Technology Services via Netify ↗
Scores are weighted across 40 capabilities with points accrued based on: yes 1.0, via partner 0.75, via managed service 0.65, partial 0.5, not confirmed 0.15, not primary 0. Extended dimensions are indicative desk research; confirm via RFP.
Cite this research
Netify, "Best SD-WAN and SASE providers for mpls migration (2026)", Netify SASE and SD-WAN comparison, updated 29 July 2026: https://netify.co.uk/sase/best/sd-wan-sase-providers-for-mpls-migration
Machine-readable version: https://netify.co.uk/sase/best/sd-wan-sase-providers-for-mpls-migration/data.json · Programmatic access: POST https://netify.co.uk/sase/api/mcp/ (tool: build_sase_shortlist)
Questions
About this ranking
Which SD-WAN and SASE providers are best for mpls migration?
The ranking above orders providers by weighted capability score with feature weighting tuned for mpls migration: the features that matter most for this priority carry more than double weight.
How is this ranking calculated?
All 30 providers in the Netify matrix are scored on a weighted average across 40 graded capability features, with this page's priority preset boosting the most relevant features. The same engine powers the interactive shortlist builder and the MCP tool.
Can I refine this list?
Yes. Open the interactive shortlist builder to add your sector, regions, operating model and security requirements on top of this priority. Every configuration is a shareable URL.
More ranked shortlists